Americana-Hispana
The Americana-Hispana series began in 1997 as an act of recognition and insistence. At the time, I did not yet have language for what I was doing, only a deep internal necessity. I was painting still lifes, but I was not interested in traditional still life as an exercise in illusion or virtuosity. I was interested in still life as a site of memory, identity, and cultural negotiation.
These paintings emerged from my lived experience as a woman shaped by multiple histories: Cuban, Puerto Rican, Spanish, African, and American. I had grown up surrounded by objects that carried layered meanings, objects that moved between domestic intimacy and cultural symbolism, between personal memory and collective history. In Americana-Hispana, these objects became protagonists.
What appears on the surface as a still life, a bowl, a cloth, a fruit, a devotional item, functions instead as a portrait of cultural inheritance. These paintings are not nostalgic. They are not illustrations of heritage. They are acts of placement. I was placing my own history, my own visual language, into a Western painting tradition that had rarely made room for such complexity.
During the late 1990s, I was encountering academic and institutional environments that did not yet know how to speak except through theory. At that time I was unable to articulate theory, let alone speak about my hybridity. My paintings were done intuitively, and subconsciously. They came from the kitchen, the table, the altar, the everyday arrangements of lived life. I was asserting that these spaces, and the objects within them, were worthy of sustained attention, but I had no way to say this verbally at that time in my life.
Pattern entered these works early and decisively. Tablecloths became grids. Walls echoed structures of repetition. Pattern was not decorative; it was structural. It allowed multiple systems to coexist within a single image: domestic space and cultural history, intimacy and distance, stillness and tension. Pattern became a way to hold complexity without flattening it.
The grid, which appears frequently in these paintings, was both a formal and conceptual choice. It referenced art history, particularly Western systems of order and rationality, while simultaneously disrupting them through color, object placement, and cultural reference. The grid was something I inhabited rather than obeyed. It allowed me to claim space without erasure.
In retrospect, Americana-Hispana contains many of the ideas that would later expand across my entire practice: the relationship between micro and macro, the intelligence of pattern, the idea that identity is not singular but relational. These paintings are quiet, but they are not passive. They insist on being seen slowly.
The series also marked an early articulation of something that would become central to my work: that art can function as a site of healing through recognition. To see one’s own culture, one’s own history, one’s own domestic reality treated with seriousness and care is a form of restoration. These paintings were made for myself, but they were also made for anyone who has ever lived between worlds.
Americana-Hispana does not resolve identity; it holds it. The paintings allow contradiction to remain visible. They acknowledge that heritage is not fixed, that memory is layered, that belonging is complex. In doing so, they quietly assert that complexity itself is a form of truth.
On this site, Americana-Hispana exists as an archive rather than a conclusion. The works here trace the beginning of a long trajectory, one that continues to unfold across faces, roots, neural networks, language, and ritual. These paintings remain foundational not because they define my practice, but because they contain its first clear declaration: that lived experience, in all its hybridity, deserves sustained attention.
For more information refer to ABOUT and Ideas on Art
